Assignment Chef icon Assignment Chef

[SOLVED] Assignment 2 ecse 420 questions 1. (24 marks) this question will examine the concept of locks. 1.1. implement the filter lock described

5.0 1 customer review Digital download

Digital download

$25.00

Availability
In stock
Checkout
One item

Need a hand?

Message us on WhatsApp for payment or download support.

WhatsApp QR code
1. (24 marks) This question will examine the concept of Locks.
1.1. Implement the Filter lock described in Chapter 2 of the course text.
1.2. Does the Filter lock allow some threads to overtake others an arbitrary number of times?
Explain.1.3. Implement Lamport’s Bakery lock also described in Chapter 2.
1.4. Does the Bakery lock allow some threads to overtake others an arbitrary number of times?
Explain1.5. Propose a test that verifies if a lock works, i.e., if it provides mutual exclusion.
1.6. Provide an implementation for the proposed test and verify if the implemented locks do
provide mutual exclusion.2. (8 marks) Consider LockOne and LockTwo introduced in the text book; do they still satisfy twothread mutual exclusion if the shared atomic registers – “flag” in LockOne and “victim” in LockTwo
– are replaced by regular registers?3. (12 marks) Programmers at the Flaky Computer Corporation designed the protocol shown in
Fig. 1 to achieve n-thread mutual exclusion. For each question, either sketch a proof, or display
an execution where it fails.3.1. Does this protocol satisfy mutual exclusion? (Hint: Start the proof by assuming that two
threads A and B are in the critical section at the same time.)
3.2. Is this protocol deadlock-free? Explain.
3.3. Is this protocol starvation-free? Explain.1 class LockThree implements Lock {
2 private int turn;
3 private boolean busy = false;
4 public void lock() {
5 int me = ThreadID.get();
6 turn = me;
7 do {
8 busy = true;
9 } while ( turn = me || busy);
10 }
11 public void unlock() {
12 Busy = false;
13 }
14 }
Fig.1 LockThree Lock used in Question 24. (12 marks) For each of the histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, are they sequentially consistent?
Linearizable? Justify your answer.
Fig. 2 History (a)
Fig. 3 History (b)5. (8 marks) Consider the class shown in Fig. 4. Suppose two threads A and B are concurrently
calling the methods writer and reader.5.1. According to what you have been told about the Java memory model, will the reader method
ever divide by zero? If yes, describe the order in which writer and reader should be invoked
(by threads A and B) and take effect for a division by zero to happen.5.2. Is division by zero possible if both x and v are volatile? What happens if neither x nor v are
volatile? Justify your answer.
Fig. 4 Volatile example6. (8 marks) Consider the regular M-valued MRSW construction shown in Fig. 5; True or false:
6.1. If we change the loop at line 11 to “for (int i = x + 1; i < RANGE; i++)”, then the construction
is still a regular M-valued MRSW register. Justify your answer.6.2. If we change the loop at line 11 to “for (int i = x + 1; i < RANGE; i++)”, then the construction
yields a safe M-valued MRSW register. Justify your answer.
Fig. 5 The regular M-valued MRSW class7. (4 marks) Show that if binary consensus using atomic registers is impossible for two threads, then
it is also impossible for n threads, where n > 2. (Hint: argue by reduction: if we had a protocol to
solve binary consensus for n threads, then we can transform it into a two-thread protocol.)8. (4 marks) Show that if binary consensus using atomic registers is impossible for n threads, then
so is consensus over k values, where k > 2.
Total: 80 marks